Fatigue Performance and Fracture Toughness of AISI304 and AISI304L
Austenitic stainless steels have become increasingly popular for various applications where corrosion resistance is a major concern. Two of the most popularly used members of the austenitic stainless steel family are AISI 304 (00Cr18Ni9) and AISI 304L (00Cr19Ni10). Although they both belong to the same family of stainless steel, they differ in the amount of carbon content, which affects their mechanical properties such as fatigue performance and fracture toughness. This paper will discuss the fatigue performance and fracture toughness of AISI 304 and AISI 304L.
AISI 304 has a higher carbon content compared to AISI 304L. As a result, AISI 304 has higher strength than AISI 304L at room temperature. At high temperatures, AISI 304’s strength decreases faster than AISI 304L due to the increased carbon content. This difference in strength impacts the fatigue performance of the two materials in two ways: fatigue strength and fatigue life. The fatigue strength of AISI 304 is typically higher than that of AISI 304L, while the fatigue life of AISI 304 is usually shorter. The reason for this behavior is that the increased carbon content in AISI 304 results in higher strain hardening and reduced ductility, which makes it more prone to fatigue failure.
The fracture toughness of AISI 304 is also higher than that of AISI 304L due to its increased carbon content. AISI 304 has higher resistance to crack propagation due to its higher energy to fracture and lower toughness than AISI 304L. The difference in fracture toughness between the two materials can be attributed to the difference in microstructural components such as grain size, dislocation density, and the presence of carbide precipitates. The higher pullout forces of carbide precipitates cause AISI 304 to have a higher fracture toughness than AISI 304L.
In conclusion, AISI 304 has higher fatigue strength and fracture toughness than AISI 304L due to its higher carbon content. However, AISI 304’s fatigue life is usually shorter than that of AISI 304L. This reduced fatigue life is due to its higher strain hardening and reduced ductility, which make it more prone to fatigue failure. Therefore, it is important to consider the fatigue performance and fracture toughness of these two materials when selecting which one is best suited for a particular application.