Introduction
Broadly speaking, political marketing can be defined as special marketing activities to contribute to a political economy. It refers to the activities aimed at winning political power or influencing public policy. In recent years, this strategy has been used more and more by brands, who’ve been seeking to leverage their political power and influence to gain bigger market shares and win customer loyalty. It has been particularly noticeable in the availability of goods and services across different cultural contexts, as well as aiding campaigns run by certain franchises. This article will analyse the impact of brand political marketing on public welfare, critically examining its advantages and disadvantages, and assessing its efficacy.
Advantages
The concept of brand political marketing offers a unique opportunity for businesses to expand their influence and reach. By leveraging their political position, brands are able to capitalise on the trust that customers place in them. This is especially true in the context where votes are swayed – a situation that is becoming increasingly common as the political and economic sphere become ever more globalised. Political marketing campaigns can also help brands to illustrate their commitment to public welfare. Through partnering with charities and non-governmental organisations (NGOs), companies can demonstrate their social awareness and engender positive publicity. This is particularly pertinent during election cycles, when voters are more likely to stick with a candidate or a party with a strong social agenda.
Other advantages include the ability to access additional resources and flexibility with regards to marketing strategies. Political marketing offers brands the opportunity to engage in multiple tactics, such as collateral material, public relations and trans-media campaigns. Additionally, partnerships with government organisations may provide access to financial resources and technological assistance.
Disadvantages
Political marketing can become extremely costly, particularly in cases where a high profile campaign is involved. This can prove to be an obstacle to smaller, less established companies who may not be able to leverage their political power as effectively. Additionally, campaigns that are based on political platforms may be perceived negatively, as the brand is effectively using politics to make a profit – not everyone may be a fan of the particular stance taken. Furthermore, if the campaign is following a controversial stance, it can result in negative publicity, as well as any potential legal implications.
Conclusion
Brand political marketing is a complex strategy that can provide numerous advantages, particularly in terms of gaining trust, achieving a wider reach, and demonstrating a company’s commitment to public welfare. However, there are also several risks associated with this type of marketing, such as costs, legal implications, and negative publicity. Overall, brands should carefully consider the risks and rewards of engaging in political marketing campaigns, in order to ensure that they effectively impact public welfare and gain customer loyalty.