Z-score model

Finance and Economics 3239 12/07/2023 1062 Avery

Introduction The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP ) is a decision-making tool developed in the 1970s by Thomas Saaty that’s used by individuals or groups to prioritize and make choices based on their preferences and beliefs. It allows decision-makers to analyze the different options available to ......

Introduction

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP ) is a decision-making tool developed in the 1970s by Thomas Saaty that’s used by individuals or groups to prioritize and make choices based on their preferences and beliefs. It allows decision-makers to analyze the different options available to them and assign weights to those options to accurately determine the most beneficial option. The AHP method is widely used in decision-making in areas such as operations research, engineering design, healthcare, government, and market research.

The Analytic Hierarchy Process is based on the concept of setting up hierarchy between the objectives and goals of an organization, and assessing the rank of importance for those goals. This helps decision-makers in setting up a well-structured decision-making system, where the highest ranked goals can be given the highest priority and decisions can be taken accordingly. The AHP process also helps to analyze the risk and uncertainties involved in each decision as well as the expected financial returns.

How AHP Works

At the core of the AHP process lies a structure of criteria used to define each of the goals and objectives of an organization. Each criterion is then divided into a hierarchy of sub-criteria and those are further divided into the various choices to be made. Each of the criteria and their sub-criteria are then assigned weights based on the importance of the requirement.

The AHP method uses a comparison matrix to compare each option relative to the other options available. Preference scores (ranging from 0-1) are assigned based on the decision-holders answers relative to the comparison made. The scores are then multiplied by a weight assigned to each criterion and then added up to get a total for each option. After assessing all the options the option with the highest total becomes the most preferred solution.

Benefits of AHP

The AHP process is more efficient and accurate than other decision-making methods as it accounts for both hard data as well as subjective opinions while making a decision.

This makes the decision-making process more democratic and there is a higher probability of consensus among the decision makers.

The AHP method is also helpful in identifying the various factors that members of the decision-making group may not have initially realized where influencing their decisions.

The process is also quite flexible and can be easily adapted to different decision-making situations. It is also easy to use and understand, making it ideal for most decision-making situations.

Conclusion

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a decision-making tool that is proving to be very useful in a wide variety of decision-making situations. From business decisions to government policy-making, the AHP helps decision-makers make better decisions by allowing them to consider all the various factors involved in a situation. It is an efficient and accurate way of making decisions as it accounts for both objective and subjective factors as well as reducing the risk of financial losses associated with decisions. It is a flexible method of decision making and can be adapted to different situations and is easy to use and understand.

Put Away Put Away
Expand Expand
Finance and Economics 3239 2023-07-12 1062 BreezyBliss

内容 The Kano Model, or Kanos Quality Model, is a customer satisfaction model used in the development of products and services. It was developed by professor Noriaki Kano in 1984 and suggests that customer satisfaction is made up of several different categories of attributes. These categories are d......

内容

The Kano Model, or Kanos Quality Model, is a customer satisfaction model used in the development of products and services. It was developed by professor Noriaki Kano in 1984 and suggests that customer satisfaction is made up of several different categories of attributes. These categories are divided into three distinct types: Basic, Performance, and Excitement. It is a comprehensive guidance tool that can be used to evaluate customer satisfaction with a product or service.

The basic attributes are those that are necessary to meet a user’s expectation. They are the fundamental features that customers need to be satisfied with a product or service. Examples of basic attributes include features such as quality, durability and value.

Performance attributes are those that determine how good a product or service is compared to others. They often measure how well a product or service performs its primary tasks or how much it improves upon the basic attributes. Performance attributes are often compared to industry standards or customer expectations. Examples include speed, accuracy, and safety.

Excitement attributes are those that are often seen as extras or bonuses and are not always necessary. These features go beyond the basic features and offer additional benefits. Examples of excitement attributes include a stylish design or innovative technology.

Users rate each attribute from one to five, with one being the lowest rating and five being the highest. This allows companies to better understand customer attitudes and preferences. The model helps businesses develop products and services that meet the needs and wants of customers, thereby ensuring satisfaction and loyalty.

Put Away
Expand

Commenta

Please surf the Internet in a civilized manner, speak rationally and abide by relevant regulations.
Featured Entries
slip
13/06/2023
Composite steel
13/06/2023
Malleability
13/06/2023