Public Choice Theory
Public choice theory is an approach in economics that applies the theory of rational choice to analyze the decisions of individuals in relation to their involvement in the public and political spheres. The theory asserts that individuals are motivated, above all else, by self-interest and that this behavior can be applied to large groups, such as governments and other public and political organizations. This application of rational choice theory has been used to explain public policies, the growth of government, and the behavior of legislators and politicians. This theory has been widely used to explain economic and social trends and phenomena, and its application to public policy has motivated a great deal of public debate and controversy.
The public choice theory generally assumes that people pursue the maximization of their own interests, not necessarily those of the public, when they make decisions. It assumes that, similar to individuals acting in the private sphere, people in the public sphere are also motivated by self-interest. The “rational choice” aspect of the theory implies that individuals make decisions based on cost-benefit analysis. Thus, individuals involved in the public sphere will make decisions that will maximize their own benefits and minimize the costs.
The public choice theory also looks at the incentives that are created by the governmental organization and structure itself. Public choice theorists contend that governments can create incentives for individuals to behave in ways that are contrary to their own self-interests and that adversely affect society as a whole. For example, public choice theorists argue that government programs may create economic distortions, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and higher taxation.
Public choice theory has been critiqued on a number of grounds. Critics assert that public choice theory paints an overly negative view of the public and political spheres, arguing that it assumes that people in the public sphere are motivated only by self-interest, while ignoring other factors such as altruism and ideological beliefs. Further, critics contend that the theory fails to recognize that public sector decisions are often made using different criteria than those used in the private sector, and that these criteria may be necessary for public policies that are not driven purely by self-interest. Additionally, some critics worry that too heavy a reliance on public choice theory may lead to policies and reforms that simply reflect personal interests, rather than the true public interest.
Despite its critiques, public choice theory has had a tremendous impact on the study of economics, politics, and public policy. The theories of public choice can provide insights into why certain policies are adopted or why certain public sector decisions are made. It is a useful tool for analyzing the functioning of public sector organizations, as well as the implications of existing policies. The theories of public choice have also been used to shape public policy debates and suggest reforms to the public sector. Although public choice theory has been the subject of much debate, it has had a major influence on the study and practice of public policy.