Since ancient times, there has been much debate about the importance of free will and determinism in human life. The central question of this debate is whether humans are subject to predetermined forces, such as fate, or are in some way free to control their own destiny. Both sides of this debate have significant implications for moral responsibility and personal accountability.
Supporters of free will argue that individual actions are not predetermined, and thus individuals have the freedom to make choices and be responsible for those choices. According to this view, free will does not require divine intervention or miraculous powers, but is a natural capability of the human mind. Without free will, supporters state that moral choices, such as right and wrong, cease to exist. People can be held responsible for their choices, since they have the freedom to make them.
Determinism, on the other hand, states that situations and events are predetermined, and individuals are in some way powerless. Proponents of determinism argue that one’s behavior, choices, and destiny are determined by external influences such as upbringing, genetics, and circumstance. In support of this position, determinists cite scientific studies on the effect of the brain and hormones on behavior, as well as noting the many unpredictable and uncontrollable factors that affect the human experience.
The debate between free will and determinism is not easily resolved. Both positions have persuasive points and potential impacts on the human experience. In the end, however, each individual may find that personal beliefs about free will and determinism shape his or her attitude and outlook on life. By exploring the implications of each side, every person can determine a way to make sense of the complex relationship between free will and determinism.
