Introduction
International trade theory is a subject that has been studied for centuries to explain the difference in production and distribution of goods and services between countries. In the past, classical and neoclassical theories of international trade have been the dominant theories. In recent years, however, new theories of international trade have been proposed to explain the dynamics of international exchange. This paper will examine three of these contemporary theories of international trade: absolute advantage, the Heckscher-Ohlin model, and new trade theory. Having discussed the core characteristics of each theory, the paper will provide an assessment of the empirical evidence supporting each model.
Absolute Advantage
The first theory of international trade that this paper will discuss is the absolute advantage theory. This theory originates in the work of Adam Smith, who argued that countries could benefit from international trade if they had absolute advantage in producing certain goods and services. Simply put, absolute advantage exists when a country can produce goods and services at a lower cost than the rest of the world, giving it a competitive edge in the global marketplace. This theory explains why certain countries, like China, have become the leaders in producing certain goods and services, such as electronics and apparel.
Heckscher-Ohlin Model
The Heckscher-Ohlin model is a neoclassical trade theory which suggests that each country has specific advantages and disadvantages in trade that are based on the factors of production (such as land, labor, and capital) that are most abundant. For example, a country with abundant capital might have an advantage in goods that require intensive capital investment (e.g., machine tools). This theory is used to explain why certain countries succeed in certain industries and fail in others. For example, China, with an abundance of cheap labor, has had success in the apparel industry while Japan, with an abundance of capital, has had success in the electronics industry.
New Trade Theory
The third theory of international trade that will be discussed is new trade theory. This theory is based on the notion that countries can benefit from international trade by specializing in goods and services that they produce relatively more efficiently than other countries. In contrast to the absolute advantage theory and the Heckscher-Ohlin model, the new trade theory focuses on dynamic gains from international trade rather than static gains. For example, by specializing in an industry and exploiting economies of scale, it may be possible for a country to gain a competitive advantage over its rivals. This theory has been used to explain why certain countries, such as Japan, have been able to become dominant in certain industries (e.g., automobiles) and why certain countries, such as China, have become major producers of certain products (e.g., apparel).
Empirical Evidence
This paper has discussed three theories of international trade: absolute advantage, the Heckscher-Ohlin model, and new trade theory. To assess which of these theories is most likely to be supported by empirical evidence, it is important to consider the evidence that has been collected to support each theory. Studies have found that the absolute advantage theory is largely supported by evidence, as countries with absolute advantages in producing certain goods or services tend to specialize in those goods or services and dominate the corresponding markets. Similarly, the Heckscher-Ohlin model has been supported by studies that show countries with abundant factors of production, such as capital and labor, tend to specialize in goods that require those factors. Finally, studies have supported the new trade theory, finding that countries can gain competitive advantages by specializing in certain goods and services and exploiting economies of scale.
Conclusion
This paper has discussed three contemporary theories of international trade: absolute advantage, the Heckscher-Ohlin model, and new trade theory. Each theory explains how countries can benefit from international trade by exploiting their relative advantages. It has been found that all three theories are supported by empirical evidence, although the degree to which each theory is supported varies by country. Thus, while there is no clear consensus on which international trade theory is the most accurate, evidence suggests that all three theories can be used to explain the dynamics of international exchange.